Friday, January 13, 2012

Florida Bound!

By the time this post goes up, my mother, sister, and I will be well on our way down to Orlando, Florida. From where we are in Michigan, it is about a 21 or 22 hour drive. We are possibly stopping at the halfway point.

My sister will be interning for Disney this semester, which she is pretty excited about. When my mom asked if I would mind driving down with her and Torrie to help Torrie get settled, I was pretty excited! A fun vacation in the middle of winter? SIGN ME UP!

This week I will be doing lots of reading, as well as a few posts for the blog. My computer IS coming with me, so keep in touch! I will make sure to update as often as I can in the evenings, and yes, I will be reading A LOT. :)

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Vacation Reads.

I am such a procrastinator. I am due to be at my parents' house in another hour or so. And while I have my clothes packed, I am struggling with what to pack in regards to reading material (as you might recall, I am driving to Florida and back to take my sister down to Disney, where she will be interning for the semester).

I am a habitual overpacker. When we were in Orlando this summer, I packed enough clothes for two and half weeks. We were there a week. I always feel like I MIGHT need something, so I pack it. At least this time we are driving, so space isn't too limited. I did try and cut down on my clothing options, but now I am struggling with the thought of packing books.

Here are the Shakespeare titles I am bringing:
  • Twelfth Night (I am over halfway through it and will probably finish before bed tonight, but it has to come with)
  • Richard III
  • Henry IV Part 1
  • Henry IV Part 2
  • Othello
  • The Merchant of Venice
  • King Lear
  • A Midsummer Night's Dream
  • Hamlet 
Considering the amount of time we'll be in the car and that we won't be doing too much on Sunday, I can probably finish all of those by then. I will need reading material for the rest of the week (by the pool) and for the long ride back home. So I need bigger titles as well. Here is what I am thinking:
  • David Copperfield by Dickens
  • Nicholas Nickleby by Dickens
  • War and Peace by Tolstoy
Now, that might seem like a lot, but I am not planning on reading all of those! I want to chug through some War and Peace for the readalong (I have to finish it by the end of June, but I haven't started yet), and the Dickens is for February. I'll also be reading The Fault in Our Stars by John Green, which my lovely mother picked up for me the other day. :)

And while I'll also have Homer, my NookColor, with me, I feel like I am going to run out of things to read! Silly? YES.

So, question...when you go on vacation, how much do you bring to read? What kinds of things come with you?

And can you think of anything else I should bring with me? or do you think I am just plain crazy? :)

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Movie Adaptations (Shakespeare Reading Month).

I hope you are all enjoying your Shakespearean reads this month in honor of Shakespeare Reading Month! I know I am!

Today's post is on some movie adaptations of Shakespeare's plays. Personally, I LOVE watching adaptations of books and plays! And now, with all the streaming media, older films are easier to find. Another great resource for finding movies is your local library.

Movies based on Shakespeare's plays are vast. Since he left behind 38 plays, Shakespeare has become a great source of material for filmmakers. And since movies have hit it big, there have been hundreds of adaptations. Some are modern adaptations-meaning the play is referenced or only the plotline is followed. Some are traditional, some take liberties. Some focus on Shakespeare himself, and others are all about pushing the envelope. I think they're all wonderful in their own way!

Now, there is no way I could talk about all of the movie adaptations of Shakespeare's plays, as there are close to 500...and counting. Instead, I picked 20 that I have either seen, want to see, or have heard a lot about. I'll be specific when I discuss each film about whether I have seen it. Please let me and everyone else know in the comments if there is another adaptation we all need to watch!

I also want to point you in the direction of Rotten Tomatoes "Greatest Shakespeare Movies" for another great source on Shakespearean films.


O (2001: Rated R)

O is based on the play Othello, one of Shakespeare's heralded "4 great tragedies." While I haven't read Othello, or seen any movie adaptations of the play, I have heard a lot about the play. The play itself contains a lot of references to racism, violence, angst, and identity, making it a good choice for high school students (a lot to relate to!).

The movie stars Julia Stiles, Josh Hartnett, Mekhi Phifer, Andrew Keegan, and Martin Sheen among others. Instead of the traditional storyline, the plot was adapted by director Tim Nelson to a high school setting.

I remember when this one came out, and while I wanted to see it, I never had the opportunity. This film seems to have some mixed reviews-mainly concerns that it is too violent (what do people expect when it is rated R?). I still want to see it at some point-perhaps after I finish Othello this month!


The Lion King (1994: Rated G)

Are you surprised to see a Disney movie on this list? Don't be!

The Lion King, while not a direct adaptation, has elements of two Shakespearean plays: Hamlet and Richard III. While I have only focused on the aspects of Hamlet in my previous viewings (including watching it last weekend), I know that I am going to have to watch it yet again after finishing Richard III this month.

There are scenes in here that I love because of their reference to Hamlet. The scene with Mufasa's ghost gets me every time, as well as Simba's constant struggle with his identity and purpose in life-sounds a lot like the whiny Hamlet, doesn't it?

If you haven't seen this one in awhile, find your old VHS tape and give it a go (or pick up a copy before it heads back to that stupid Disney vault).


She's the Man (2006: Rated PG-13)

Twelfth Night is actually the play I am currently reading, which makes me laugh considering I saw this movie years ago. The spoof is pretty darn funny! The play has quite a bit of cross-dressing, which makes it one of the more interesting of Shakespeare's plays (he loved switching his character's identities).

She's the Man, starring Amanda Bynes, is a modern retelling of the play. There is no Shakespearean language, but the plot, cross-dressing and all, serves as the inspiration.

The movie is quite hilarious, and that should say something considering the fact that I think Amanda Bynes isn't that funny of a girl. But the comedy is spot on, the situations are hilarious, and it is just what you can expect from a teen comedy spoofing the Bard (Plus Channing Tatum is in it, and he is easy on the eyes...)

Richard III (1995: Rated R)

I actually had never even heard of this film until I was searching for a few more film adaptations of Shakespeare's historical plays. It probably doesn't help that I was only 10 when it came out. And since I'm reading this one, I figured I should do a little more research!

This film stars Ian McKellen (Yes, Gandalf from Lord of the Rings..."You SHALL NOT PASS!"- Sorry, couldn't help it), as the murderous and insane Richard III. Set in a fascist and scary form of England in the 1930s, the film takes some liberties with Shakespeare's original work.

That being said, the movie has earned great reviews and I am anxious to get my hands...errr....eyes on this one to see what I think of the adaptation and move to a more "modern" setting for one of Shakespeare's historical plays. Has anyone else seen this one?


The Taming of the Shrew (1967)

The Taming of the Shrew has long been one of my favorite plays by Shakespeare, ever since I first read it in high school, so when my college Shakespeare class watched this film as a "fun" class, I was absolutely enthralled in the film.

Directed by Franco Zeffirelli, this film stars two of the biggest actors of the era: Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor. The costumes are fabulous, as is the acting. Taylor really captures the anger and reluctance of Katharina, and Burton is an excellent Petruchio!

I love the whole "battle of the sexes" that plays out in both the play and the film. It is fun and entertaining!


The Tempest (2012: Rated PG-13)

Considering that this one is a recent release, I'm surprised that I had never even heard of it until I was looking for film versions of The Tempest. I just read the play back in August of 2010, so you can imagine my shock! It was also nominated for Best Costume Design at the Oscars...so why haven't I read of it?

In any case, the film stars Helen Mirren as Prospero...a bit of gender and role switching from the original play (Prospero is a male character in the play). There is also quite a bit of CGI as noted by the reviews, and quite a few alterations from the play.

I still think it looks interesting, and since Helen Mirren is such an amazing actress, I think I will have to remember this one for the future!


Anonymous (2011: Rated PG-13)

I was really bummed that I didn't go and see this when it was in theaters this fall (I checked and none of the theaters in the area are still showing it).

This film focuses on the controversy surrounding Shakespeare's authorship. Taking place during the failed Essex revolution, the film portrays the Earl of Oxford as the true author of the Shakespearean works.

I'm curious to see what the film has to say, as well as whether it references any real evidence to back up that statement. :) I am team Will Shakespeare from Stratford, so unless someone finds some pretty compelling to prove that someone else is the true author, I won't be swayed. But I'm sure the film is entertaining and offers a lot to think about (for instance, how little we really know about the past!).


Julius Caesar (1953)

The oldest adaptation on this list and one that I really enjoy, is this 1953 adaptation of Julius Caesar with the dreamy Marlon Brando as Antony.

This is a well-done and fairly accurate representation of the play, and I really love the scenery, costumes, and the actors in this one. The story of Julius Caesar is one that really interests me, and since finishing the play in the most recent readathon, I've been thinking about reading a little more about Mr. Caesar.

In any case, the movie is a wonderful old classic, and you should really think about watching it at some point.

And come on, Brando? Yes please.


Coriolanus (2011: Rated R)

Besides the fact that this has Gerard Butler in it (as a Spartan of Michigan State, I have a certain affection for Butler and 300), I love that this new adaptation is taking on one of the Bard's more unfamiliar plays!

This one will hit the theaters a little later this month, and even my husband is excited to go see it! Of course, I am curious to see how close they will keep the film to the feeling of the play. Will they keep the language (always my first concern)? You can tell by the trailers that they have modernized the era and such-obviously there are no tanks in Shakespeare's original. But, I have high hopes that the film will capture the spirit and power of the story that Shakespeare told.

Anyone else planning on seeing this in the theater?


Othello (1995: Rated R)

I actually have this one set up with Netflix as a film I WILL watch before the end of the month. Like I said above, I haven't read Othello yet, but I am anxious to get to it.

Since Kenneth Branagh is is fabulous Shakespearean actor, I have really high hopes for this somewhat recent interpretation of the play. I think that Branagh really understands the underlying meanings of Shakespeare's plays and always finds a way to bring them to life.

(Do you know that we have Branagh to thank for the "recent" revival of interest in turning the Bard's plays into film? yep, his fault).

For those that have read the play AND seen the movie, is this a good adaptation?


West Side Story (1961)

I'm kind of scared to admit that I haven't seen this one either! I know enough about it to say that West Side Story is a "modern" interpretation of the Romeo and Juliet story.

Instead of Italy, the story is set in New York City. Our star-crossed lovers come from rival gangs and the expected drama ensues.

I remember that we almost convinced our ninth grade teacher to show this to us instead of the old version of the actual play, but she said no (something about the violence level?). This is definitely a movie that has been on my radar ever since, so I know that at some point I'll cave and watch it.



Shakespeare in Love (1998: Rated R)

I'm almost a bit embarrassed to say that I love this movie. It is one of the films I watch when I've had a crappy day. This movie takes a very interesting approach to the inspiration behind Shakespeare's great love story in Romeo and Juliet by having Will fall in love with the beautiful Viola. Their love story inspires his writing of the play.

One of the things I love about this movie is the other pieces of the era we get as well-from boys playing female roles, to the fights and violence, to the grandeur or Elizabeth's court.

And one of my favorite parts is watching Ben Affleck play a pompous actor. Cracks me up every time. :)

No really, the movie is a good romance, and it did win a bunch of Oscars!


The Merchant of Venice (2004: Rated R)

This is another play coming up in my reading pile this month, so this is another movie waiting its turn in the Netflix queue. Again, I was surprised at finding this one, since I don't remember it hitting theaters (perhaps I just have a bad memory).

This play focuses a lot on racial tension, especially in regards to Jews. From reviews I have read online, the film is a fairly accurate depiction of the play. I am also curious to see Al Pacino in a Shakespearean role, since that isn't what I am used to!

The film also stars Jeremy Irons, who is a fabulous actor as well, so I will go into this one with high hopes!



Henry V (1989: Rated PG-13)

This movie is the film that started the "modern" craze of adapting the Bard's plays for the big screen (as I started to say above). Directed by Kenneth Branagh, this film focuses on the king of the same name, who battled his way into France.

Branagh did a fabulous job with this one (I read the play and watched the film in college). Again, it is a fairly accurate representation and it really brings the battle and hardship to life in a way that the play cannot. But mostly, I love Branagh in this...well, I love Branagh in anything (he plays Gilderoy Lockhart in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets if you didn't know). But he shines here.

And we have this film to think for the other Shakespearean films that emerged in the 1990s and 2000s. That is a big deal.


Romeo + Juliet (1996: Rated PG-13)

I was 11 when this came out, and I remember it being a big deal because of Leo. This was around the whole Leonardo CRAZE, which I was sadly a part of. And at my young age, I really loved this movie. What teenage girl doesn't love the idea of Romeo and Juliet?

Anyway, this is definitely a different interpretation of the play. Director Baz Luhrmann took quite a few liberties by placing this in a more modern setting, complete with crazy Hawaiian shirts, cars, and guns. The movie is mostly in line with the language of the play (they do use lines from the end of the play at the beginning of the movie, which I don't like or understand), but the movie is still good.

And hey, young Leo. :)


Hamlet (1990: Rated PG)

I purposefully chose this version over the 1996 version (starring Kenneth Branagh of course) because I've seen this one. ;) We actually watched this one as part of my AP English class in high school, so I have some fond memories.

And hey, I think it's funny that Mel Gibson is in it. :) No, I actually really enjoy this version, crazy Gibson and all. There are some great visuals in it, plus it has some other fabulous actors. Glenn Close is wonderful as Gertrude. And the one and only Helena Bonham Carter is Ophelia. And if you know anything about her, you'll know that the role of Ophelia is perfect for her.

This is a great choice, especially if you are looking for a film that uses much of the same language!


Romeo and Juliet (1968: Rated G or PG-13 depending on where you look)

I think this is Director Zeffirelli's masterpiece, but I'm not enough of a film nut to back that up with tons of knowledge. ;) Anyway, this is probably one of the most accurate representations of Shakespeare's work on the big screen in regards to language, costumes, and era.

I really love the older feel of this film, and I was in love with it from the first time we watched it as ninth graders. The actors are absolutely amazing, especially John McEnery who plays Mercutio (probably my favorite Shakespearean character).

I should warn you that the movie is often labeled as G or PG. There is some very obvious nudity in the scene where Romeo leaves Juliet after spending the night with her. Be forewarned!


A Midsummer Night's Dream (1999: Rated PG-13)

As one of my favorite comedies, A Midsummer Night's Dream holds a very dear place in my heart. This movie is another that I love to watch after a crappy day, as it always makes me smile.

Since the play has such a magical, fun-loving quality, I love that the film captures the forest and the hi-jinks that ensue. The cast is great, but my favorite is Stanley Tucci as the mischievous Puck. He really captures the role of the sly fairy responsible for all the mix-ups!

I also think that Michelle Pfeiffer does a great job as Titania. Other actors include Kevin Kline, Rupert Everett, Calista Flockhart, and Christian Bale (pre-scary Batman voice).



10 Things I Hate About You (1999: Rated Pg-13)

Probably my favorite Shakespearean "spoof," 10 Things I Hate About You captures everything I love about The Taming of the Shrew. Made into a modern teen comedy, this one is just plain hilarious. In addition to the romancing and battle of the sexes, it puts in a lot of modern humor that I think Shakespeare would approve of.

The cast is also great: Heath Ledger, Julia stiles, Andrew Keegan, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt to name a few. They all do a great job of capturing the spirit of the original play-but don't think you'll hear a lot of iambic pentameter-this was merely inspired by the bard's play.

Some of my favorite scenes include Ledger's serenade by the soccer field, the paintball fight, the school counselor and her romance novel, and Gordon-Levitt's character.


Much Ado About Nothing (1993: Rated PG-13)

Hand's down my favorite Shakespearean comedy, Much Ado About Nothing is also one of my all-time favorite movies. Directed by Kenneth Branagh, it really is a great example of the Bard's play. It has great music and imagery, as well as one of the best casts in any Shakespearean adaptation: Kenneth Branagh, Kate Beckinsale, Emma Thompson, Denzel Washington, Keanu Reeves, and Michael Keaton.

Really, it shouldn't work, but it does. Reeves absolutely cracks me up as Don John the Bastard, and Thompson is amazing as the sharp-tongued Beatrice. Keaton plays Dogberry, the "clown" character, and he is simply amazing!

If there is one adaptation you watch this month, please make it be this one-I promise you'll love it! :)


There you have it, 20 movie adaptations of Shakespeare's plays. I hope that one or two (or all 20) grabbed you in some way. Please consider watching one in celebration of Shakespeare Reading Month, or mark it down for future reference.

And, if you have watched one that didn't make my list, please tell us about it in the comments! I am looking for more recommendations, and I am sure others are too!

Shakespeare: The World as Stage by Bill Bryson (Shakespeare Reading Month):

"When we reflect upon the works of William Shakespeare it is of course an amazement to consider that one man could have produced such a sumptuous, wise, varied, thrilling, ever-delighting body of work, but that is of course the hallmark of genius. Only one man had the characteristics and gifts to give us such incomparable works, and William Shakespeare of Stratford was unquestionably that man-whoever he was," (196).

I am not an expert on Shakespeare. I do think that I know more than most-say any high school student. I took a Shakespeare class in high school (we read four of his plays and many of his sonnets in a semester long course), as well as in college. For my college course, we stayed away from many of his well-known works-my professor assumed we had read them in high school, which was a bad assumption-and we focused on some of the lesser-known works-we read Cymbeline, The Winter's Tale, and The Two Noble Kinsmen among others. We also spent a lot of time discussing the Globe Theater and some of the specifics on the time period.

So yes, I think I know a little more than some, but there is still SO MUCH out there to read and learn about one of the most famous, well-known, and loved literary figures of all time. But what is more fascinating is how little we know about Shakespeare, considering he has left such a lasting legacy.

Bryson is not a Shakespearean scholar, which is why his exploration of Will Shakespeare is so fascinating. He manages to explain what we do know about the man in simple everyday terms, and with a touch of humor. He doesn't bog down his narrative with quotes, facts, and numbers, but seems to weave in the almost silly facts of other scholars. I really enjoyed how he put this;

"Faced with a wealth of text but a poverty of context, scholars have focused obsessively on what they can know. They have counted every word he wrote, logged every dib and jot. They can tell us (and have done so) that Shakespeare's works contain 138,198 commas, 26,794 colons, and 15,785 question marks; that ears are spoken of 401 times in his plays; that dunghill is used 10 times and dullard twice; that his characters refer to love 2,259 times but to hate just 183 times; that he used damned 105 times and bloody 226 times, but bloody-minded only twice; that he wrote hath 2,069 times but has just 409 times; that all together he left us 884,647 words, made up of 31,959 speeches, spread over 118,406 lines," (19).

Fascinating, right? That people have spent their lives counting these things in hopes of understanding more about the man.

Bryson fills this slim volume with this kind of information, as well as insights into Elizabethan and Jacobin England. He also discusses the construction of the theaters and how we only know what the Globe may have looked liked based on the drawing of a man who had never been there. Or that we know where it may have been placed based on a drawn panoramic view of London done by a man who had never been there. Also, that we can only guess what Shakespeare looked like based on one horrible drawing where one eye is larger than the other, the hair uneven, and the rest of it out of proportion, to a statue that was neglected and ruined with paint and whitewash. Or the painting that may be Shakespeare, but scholars can't be 100% sure.

Fascinating.

I also love that Bryson discussed those close to Shakespeare-how his two friends are responsible for putting together the First Folio, which saved 18 of his plays from being completely forgotten. We also have them to blame for not putting The History of Cardenio in the folio, meaning that one of Shakespeare's works has been lost forever (at least that we know of).

Bryson makes sure to not make assumptions, but to merely report the things we do know, as well as what is surmised by the scholars that have come before us. He credits where he needs to, which the academic side of me really appreciated. He does all this with a great deal of wit, awe, and respect for a man that we probably won't know more about.

I also loved the last chapter in the book, called "Claimants," which focuses on those who believe the man Will Shakespeare was not the person who penned all these plays. Bryson goes through the different claims, and the most popular ones, and shows how some of these people are crazy (he points out that some of the scholars claiming other authors had names like Silliman, Looney, and Battey, which cracked me up) for believing that someone else could have penned the works attributed to Shakespeare.

"A third...candidate for Shakespearean authorship was Christopher Marlowe. He was the right age (just two months older than Shakespeare), had the requisite talent, and would certainly have had ample leisure after 1593, assuming he wasn't too dead to work," (191).

In all, Bryson's book was a great introduction to Shakespeare, his world, and his legacy. While it certainly isn't the most in-depth or detailed of biographies, it gives a great overview in a fun and pleasing manner. If you are just starting out, looking for a quick and fun read, or want to make sure you are well-versed in all the books about Shakespeare and his life-this is the perfect book to choose. I know I really enjoyed it and will be visiting it often.

And as Bryson says,

"To answer the obvious question, this book was written not so much because the world needs another book on Shakespeare as because this series does. The idea is a simple one: to see how much of Shakespeare we can know, really know, from the record. Which is one reason, of course, it's so slender," (21).

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Top Ten Tuesday: Top Ten Authors I Wish Would Write Another Book.


I am pretty darn excited about this week's Top Ten Tuesday Topic: Top Ten Authors I Wish Would Write Another Book. Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly meme hosted by the wonderful folks over at The Broke and the Bookish.

As a classics blogger, I know there will come a day when I am out of books to read by certain authors. What will I do then? That is too scary to think about, so for now, I will give you my dream list of authors that I want one more book from!

In no particular order...

  1. J.K. Rowling: Are you surprised this isn't a classics writer? Don't be. I love the Harry Potter books, and I have been waiting anxiously for Rowling to announce another series...book...something! I don't know if we'll ever seen another novel by Rowling, but here is my official request for one.
  2. Jane Austen: I still have a couple of pieces by Austen I haven't read yet, but I have finished the big 6. I would love to have one more novel by her...from her later years. I wonder what it would sound like!
  3. Charlotte Bronte: Again, I have a couple more to read, but this is another author who I would love more work from. Jane Eyre was amazing and Villette blew me away. Like Austen, I would want something from when she was older.
  4. Emily Bronte: Sadly, I have read (and loved) the only novel by Emily. It was tragic and beautiful, and I think that one more from her would be an amazing addition to her legacy.
  5. Homer: Okay, technically Homer didn't write down The Odyssey or The Illiad, but this is MY fantasy, so I can dream. I would love one more epic poem by Homer so that I can geek out a bit more on my Greek Literature.
  6. J.R.R. Tolkien: I have a few of his pieces to read still, but I would love another long epic like The Lord of the Rings.
  7. William Shakespeare: I am actually going to be quite picky and request a copy of The Tragedy of Cardenio, the lost play that WASN'T put into the First Folio.
  8. Harper Lee: Yes, To Kill a Mockingbird is phenomenal, but why hasn't Lee published anything else? She mastered such skill in that novel and created such lovable characters...I would love another novel by Lee.
  9. Herman Melville: I truly think Melville was ahead of his time. I would love to see another novel from him-in the scope of Moby-Dick.
  10. Edith Wharton: I am slowly running out of novels to read by one of my favorite authors...I would love just one more, written just for me. :)
What about you? What authors do you want another book from?